Learning Obstacle On Integral (Antiderivative) Material In Didactic Situation Theory
Keywords:
Integral, Learning Barriers, Didactic Situation TheorysAbstract
This research aims to identify the learning obstacles faced by engineering students in solving integral problems as antiderivatives. Research on this material is part of didactic situation theory, and the research results are very important to use as a basis for DDR didactic design to minimize learning obstacles. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method and the sample consists of two groups of Civil Engineering students at the University of Madura. For the first group, which consisted of five students, and the second group, which consisted of nine students, the TKR instrument for understanding integral concepts was used to obtain research data. Then, interviews were conducted to obtain this data. The research results show that engineering students face ontogenic, conceptual and epistemological learning challenges
References
Alfansyur, A., & Mariyani, M. (2020). Seni mengelola data: Penerapan triangulasi teknik, sumber dan waktu pada penelitian pendidikan sosial. Historis: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(2), 146– 150
Borji, V., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2020). On students’ understanding of implicit differentiation based on APOS theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649- 020-09991-y
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.5 45-547
Didi Suryadi. (2019). Landasan Filosofis Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR) (Tim Gapura Press, Ed.; 1 ed.). Gapura Press. https://scholar.google.com/schola r?cluster=1806705334849888400 6&hl=en&oi=scholarr
Dubinsky, E. A. I. O. A. F. S. R. W. K. (2014). Apos theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1 007/978-1-4614-7966-6
Fadillah, A., Firmansyah, M. A., Syarifah, L. L., Rahardjo, S., & Erliani, T. P. (2019). Analisis Learning Obstacle pada Materi Integral. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(6), 243–251.
Fitriani, N., Kadarisma, G., & Amelia, R. (2020). Pengembangan Desain Didaktis untuk Mengatasi Learning Obstacle Pada Materi Dimensi Tiga. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i 2.2686
Job, P., & Schneider, M. (2014). Empirical positivism, an epistemological obstacle in the learning of calculus. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858- 014-0604-0
Maryono, M., & Sholihah, U. (2022). Eksplorasi Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) pada Kelas Kalkulus Integral di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1473. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v1 1i2.4975
Mahayukti, G. A., Dewi, P. K., Hartawan, I. G. N. Y., & Jana, P. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Mengerjakan Soal Kalkulus Integral dalam Pembelajaran Daring. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 2121. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v1 1i3.5036
Madonna, S. (2014). Efisiensi Energi Melalui Penghematan Penggunaan Air (Studi Kasus: Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Universitas Bakrie). Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 12(4)
Kurniawan, A., Juliangkary, E., & Pratama, M. Y. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Fungsi. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v7i 1.1679
Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in nursing & health, 40(1), 23–42.
Kadarisma, G., & Amelia, R. (2018). Epistemological Obstacles in Solving Equation of Straight Line Problems. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 3, 905– 910.
Monariska, E.-. (2019a). Analisis kesulitan belajar mahasiswa pada materi integral. Jurnal Analisa, 5(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v5i1.4 181
Monariska, E.-. (2019b). Analisis kesulitan belajar mahasiswa pada materi integral. Jurnal Analisa, 5(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v5i1.4 181
Prihandhika, A., Prabawanto, S., Turmudi, T., & Suryadi, D. (2020). Epistemological Obstacles: An Overview of Thinking Process on Derivative Concepts by APOS Theory and Clinical Interview. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1521/3/032028
Rohana, D., Sukasno, S., & Purwasi, L. A. (2019). Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan Teknik Scaffolding terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 5(2), 142– 151.
Rosita, C. D., Maharani, A., Tonah, T., & Munfi, M. (2020). Learning Obstacle Siswa SMP pada Materi Lingkaran. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i 2.2735
Setyawan, F., & Astuti, D. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Kalkulus Integral Berbasis Pendekatan Computational Thinking. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2000. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v1 0i4.4308
Sholekah, L. M., Anggreini, D., & Waluyo, A. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Ditinjau Dari Koneksi Matematis Materi Limit Fungsi. WACANA AKADEMIKA: Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.30738/wa.v1i2. 1413
Sudarman, S. W., & Linuhung, N. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Scafolding Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Integral Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pedidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhamadiyah Metro, 6(1), 33–39.
Hinchcliff, E. (2023, November 8). Learning to Paint: An Autoethnographic Exploration of Adult Learning Beyond Formal Learning Contexts. Adult Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595231213091
Suhendri, H. (2011). Pengaruh kecerdasan matematis–logis dan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 1(1).
Khasanah, N., & Rubini, R. (2021, December 2). Kontribusi Pemuda Muslim dalam Dunia Pendidikan Menuju Indonesia Emas Tahun 2045. Al-Manar, 10(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v10i2.302
Susanti, N. I., & Yulaida, S. (2015). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Pemahaman Materi Fungsi Komposisi Siswa Kleas XI Semester 2 MAN Pesanggaran Tahun Pelajaran 2014-2015. Pancaran Pendidikan, 4(4), 99– 112. pancaran/article/view/2182
Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical design research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran matematika. Prosiding seminar nasional matematika dan pendidikan matematika, 1, 3–12.
Sulistiawati, S., Suryadi, D., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Desain Didaktis Penalaran Matematis untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP pada Luas dan Volume Limas. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika KreatifInovatif, 6(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v 6i2.4833
Utari, R. S., & Utami, A. (2020). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa dalam mengidentifikasi penyelesaian soal integral tak tentu dan tentu. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 39–50.
Ajjahidi, M. H. (2023, November 7). DINAMIKA HUKUM KELUARGA TERHADAP PENGATURAN PERCERAIAN DALAM NEGARA INDONESIA DAN BEBERAPA NEGARA-NEGARA MUSLIM DI DUNIA. Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban Dan Hukum Islam), 6(2), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v6i2.11732
Yulianti, E. N., Rahmawati, N. D., & Purwosetiyono, F. X. D. (2021). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam mengerjakan soal matematika pada materi fungsi komposisi dan fungsi invers ditinjau dari motivasi belajar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6, 37–41
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licence
Creative Commons license
The journal is published by Larisa Teknik Sipil licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any media or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and develop material for any purpose, even commercially
Under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in any way that would imply that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Share Alike — If you mix, modify, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal provisions or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits










